4 posts tagged with "architecture"

AI agents promise autonomous reasoning and dynamic tool use, but traditional frameworks like LangChain and LangGraph sacrifice transparency for autonomy. ObjectWeaver takes a different approach: composable, structured intelligence where every decision is an inspectable object, every workflow is explicitly defined, and 100% JSON reliability enables sophisticated multi-step systems without the debugging nightmares of opaque agent loops.

This article explores how ObjectWeaver composes agent-like capabilities—reasoning, tool selection, conditional branching, state management—through guaranteed structured objects instead of unpredictable ReAct loops.

Reliably generating structured JSON from Large Language Models presents a fundamental challenge with two distinct solutions: grammar-constrained generation and LLM orchestration. Grammar-constrained generation (Outlines, Guidance, llama.cpp GBNF, Formatron) forces compliance through inference-time token masking—optimized for simple, flat schemas. ObjectWeaver orchestrates field-level generation with parallel processing, dependency management, and intelligent model routing—designed for complex production schemas where different fields demand different capabilities.

We chose the GNU Affero General Public License v3 (AGPL-3) for ObjectWeaver. This wasn't a decision we made lightly. In the world of open-source infrastructure, the choice usually falls between permissive licenses (MIT, Apache 2.0) and copyleft licenses (GPL, AGPL).

We chose AGPL-3 to ensure ObjectWeaver remains a community-driven standard while building a sustainable business. Here is why.

CodeLeft is an AI-powered code quality tool built as a VS Code extension. Their product performs intelligent static analysis on your code against metrics such as SOLID, Clean Code and OWASP Top Ten along with generating comprehensive documentation including requirements tables, data flow analysis, and Mermaid diagrams directly from codebases. The challenge: standard LLM function calling had failure rates of 35-65% for complex structured outputs, making the product unusable for enterprise customers.